Finally now though, I can rest easy. A friend sent a link to me on the Stalkapedia that is Facebook that solved this particular worry. That's right, a test can now be taken to determine, with an astonishing degree of accuracy, how many five year olds a specific person could beat in a fight. My results have finally come through, and I proudly report them back to you.
31
Thirty-one! Brilliant, eh? That means I could happily teach an average class of five year olds with no fear of insurrection. Now if anyone could tell me how many golf balls you'd have to hit at a cow to topple it, I can finally get some shut-eye..
7 comments:
Apparently, the only way to kill a lion is by rear naked choke.
Bas Rutten says he'd just kick it in the head.
But could you take a lion if you had access to a range of throwing knives? That's the burning question..
I took the 'how many small snotty things can you take in a fight' test thing a year or two ago and I couldn't remember my results. I looked at yours though and thought yeah I'd be able to take a load of 5 year olds out. Bring it on!
I took the test again.
Turns out I can only take 12.
12!
Man, if I ever work in a nursery I am toast.
Twelve?! Jenni that's poor. Way poor. You need to get some training in with Tom.
I remember doing that a while ago, and got an abysmal score due to my ethics. Stupid ethics. What if they were zombies? Different story then!
Mah. Children, zombies, what's the difference?
Having honed my tactics through discussion with Rich, I reckon I could get past forty now. If only there were some way to find out..
Ηi theгe, Ι checκ your blog on а геgulаr
bаsіs. Υouг ωriting
ѕtyle іs аwesοme, keeρ
uр the gοοԁ work!
Feel free to ѕurf to mу ωeb blog - bucket truck
My web-site bucket truck
Post a Comment